Carbide end mills generally offer superior wear resistance compared to high-speed steel (HSS) square end mills. This is primarily due to the material properties of carbide, which is a composite of tungsten carbide particles bonded with a metallic binder, typically cobalt. Carbide is significantly harder than HSS, allowing it to maintain a sharp cutting edge for longer periods, even under high-speed and high-temperature conditions. This hardness translates to better wear resistance, making carbide end mills more suitable for high-volume production and machining harder materials like stainless steel, titanium, and cast iron.
In contrast, HSS end mills are made from an alloy of steel with elements like tungsten, molybdenum, and chromium, which provide good toughness and resistance to chipping. However, HSS is softer than carbide, leading to faster wear and a shorter tool life, especially when used on abrasive materials or at high cutting speeds. HSS end mills are more forgiving and less brittle than carbide, making them suitable for applications where tool breakage is a concern or where the material being machined is less abrasive.
While HSS end mills are generally less expensive and can be resharpened, the longer lifespan and higher performance of carbide end mills often justify their higher initial cost in demanding applications. In summary, for applications requiring high wear resistance and efficiency, carbide end mills are the preferred choice, whereas HSS end mills are more suitable for less demanding tasks or where cost is a significant factor.