Fluorescent lights and LED lights differ significantly in their suitability for hazardous locations. 
Fluorescent lights, while traditionally used in various settings, have several drawbacks in hazardous environments. They contain mercury, which poses a risk if the bulb breaks, potentially releasing toxic vapors. Additionally, fluorescent lights are more fragile and prone to breakage, increasing the risk of accidents in volatile areas. Their startup time can be slow, especially in cold conditions, and they often require ballasts, which can fail and need maintenance. Fluorescent lights also have a shorter lifespan compared to LEDs, leading to more frequent replacements and increased maintenance in hazardous locations.
LED lights, on the other hand, are more robust and better suited for hazardous environments. They are solid-state lights, meaning they are more durable and resistant to shock and vibration. LEDs do not contain hazardous materials like mercury, making them safer in case of breakage. They offer instant illumination without warm-up time, which is crucial in emergency situations. LEDs are highly energy-efficient, reducing energy consumption and heat output, which is beneficial in environments where temperature control is critical. They have a longer lifespan, reducing the need for frequent replacements and maintenance, which is advantageous in hazardous locations where access may be difficult or dangerous.
Overall, LED lights are generally preferred over fluorescent lights in hazardous locations due to their durability, safety, efficiency, and longer lifespan.