IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) and NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) overload relays differ primarily in design standards, application, and operational characteristics:
1. **Design Standards**:
- **IEC**: Follows international standards, focusing on global applicability. IEC overload relays are typically more compact and designed for modularity.
- **NEMA**: Adheres to North American standards, emphasizing robustness and durability. NEMA relays are generally larger and built for heavy-duty applications.
2. **Construction and Size**:
- **IEC**: Smaller, lightweight, and often integrated with contactors. They are designed for space-saving installations.
- **NEMA**: Larger and more rugged, suitable for harsh environments. They are often standalone units.
3. **Trip Class**:
- **IEC**: Offers a range of trip classes (e.g., Class 10, 20, 30) to suit different motor protection needs, allowing for more precise protection.
- **NEMA**: Typically uses a single trip class, often Class 20, providing a more generalized protection approach.
4. **Adjustability**:
- **IEC**: Provides finer adjustability for current settings, allowing for more precise motor protection.
- **NEMA**: Offers less granularity in settings, focusing on broader protection.
5. **Application**:
- **IEC**: Preferred in applications where space is limited and modularity is required, such as in control panels.
- **NEMA**: Used in applications demanding high reliability and durability, such as industrial environments.
6. **Cost**:
- **IEC**: Generally more cost-effective due to their compact design and material efficiency.
- **NEMA**: Typically more expensive, reflecting their robust construction and durability.
7. **Market Preference**:
- **IEC**: Widely used in Europe and other regions following international standards.
- **NEMA**: Predominantly used in North America, aligning with local standards and practices.