Rotary actuators and linear actuators serve different purposes, and their performance and efficiency are context-dependent. 
Rotary actuators convert energy into rotational motion, typically used in applications requiring continuous or partial rotation, such as robotic arms, valves, and conveyors. They are generally more compact and can provide high torque output, making them suitable for applications where space is limited. Rotary actuators can be highly efficient, especially when using electric motors, as they directly convert electrical energy into rotational motion with minimal energy loss. However, their efficiency can vary based on the type (e.g., hydraulic, pneumatic, or electric) and the specific application.
Linear actuators, on the other hand, convert energy into linear motion, ideal for applications requiring straight-line movement, such as in lifting devices, sliding doors, and industrial machinery. They can offer precise control over position and speed, which is crucial in applications demanding high accuracy. Linear actuators can be less efficient than rotary actuators due to the additional mechanical components required to convert rotational motion into linear motion, such as lead screws or belts. However, advancements in technology have improved their efficiency, particularly in electric linear actuators.
In terms of performance, rotary actuators excel in applications requiring continuous rotation and high torque, while linear actuators are better suited for tasks requiring precise linear positioning and force. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the application, including load, speed, precision, and environmental conditions.
Overall, both types of actuators have their strengths and weaknesses, and the decision should be based on the specific needs of the application, considering factors like space, load requirements, and desired motion type.