Multiaxis gantries and other industrial robots differ primarily in structure, movement, application, and flexibility.
1. **Structure**: Multiaxis gantries are typically linear systems with a Cartesian coordinate setup, consisting of three linear axes (X, Y, Z) that allow movement along straight lines. Other industrial robots, like articulated robots, have a more complex structure with multiple rotary joints, resembling a human arm.
2. **Movement**: Gantries provide linear motion and are ideal for tasks requiring precise, straight-line movements over large areas. In contrast, articulated robots offer a wider range of motion, including rotational and angular movements, allowing them to reach around obstacles and perform tasks in confined spaces.
3. **Application**: Gantries are often used in applications requiring high precision and repeatability over large workspaces, such as CNC machining, 3D printing, and material handling. Other robots, like SCARA or delta robots, are better suited for tasks requiring speed and flexibility, such as assembly, packaging, and pick-and-place operations.
4. **Flexibility**: Articulated and other non-gantry robots are generally more flexible, capable of performing a variety of tasks with different end-effectors. Gantries are more specialized, often designed for specific tasks, and may require significant reconfiguration to adapt to new applications.
5. **Footprint**: Gantries typically have a larger footprint due to their linear tracks, which can be a limitation in space-constrained environments. Other robots, especially compact models like SCARA, have a smaller footprint and can be more easily integrated into existing production lines.
6. **Cost and Complexity**: Gantries can be less complex and more cost-effective for large-scale, repetitive tasks. In contrast, the complexity and versatility of articulated robots often come with higher costs and maintenance requirements.